Publishing advice for comic books.

Getting published is hard for every creator but here are the basics of what we're looking for in comic books we want to publish and read. We'll quickly go through some broad points about pencils, inks, colors. First off, story telling from panel to panel, page to page must be of a regulated pace like a sine wave: Act One-The beginning-> inciting incident, story problem, character introductions, and theme stated within five pages. Then break into the middle/Act Two with a decisions that the character debates as the world has been disrupted (almost turned on its head if you will). This new reality must one where the characters must learn to navigate and address the story problem. It's a series of conflicts/obstacles where the protagonist fails but comes closer to resolution.

Then, midpoint. This is where there is a false victory or an agonizing defeat where the protagonist must make a decision to go forward and all the while stakes are ever increased in a break into act three.

The end, means a crisis event that leads to a final showdown where the character's internal issues are realized and dealt with along with the story problem. This must occur in every issue of a comic book. You might say, "This is a series." Fair enough, but each issue must have this structure as well although in a more simplified fashion with a beginning, middle and an end, which would in turn advance another condition to an overall story arc. One would only need to strategically position cliffhangers at the end of the issues, but that's not difficult if you have a competent outline.

Really, I shouldn't need to write the aforementioned. If you don't already know about what was explained, then it isn't advisable to try and reach out to publishers yet. Just being honest.

Okay pencillers, this is for you. Panel to panel-> do the illustrated images transition with enough information to eliminate confusion of what is occurring? Yes, then move on. Clear connections of the action that carries the reader's eye must be composed and must move the plot along. Use only as much as you need and kill redundancy. If the sequence can be deduced quickly and clearly from the panel sequence, use as few as needed. (e.g. a kid has a baseball in his hand-> a broken window). The panels must transition to the next page if the story doesn’t jump cut to another subplot. It is best to cut to other subplots after odd pages.

The panel anatomy-> in Mid to Wide Shots, where a foreground, mid-ground and background must be established, the most important thing is have a vanishing point set at he proper place so that diminishing perspective creates the proper illusion of depth. Linear perspective is so important. In complex visual arrangements, there can be multiple vanishing points with a variety of focal points but this is difficult (like creating multiple vortices fighting for position in a two-dimensional plane like whirlpools on the surface of a pond) and utilizing a single point is normally best within a panel, which accompanies others. If you have a splash page or just a double panel page, then there’s a possibility of pulling it off.

Character: hair, hand, and hips. Hair--because it is difficult to simulate the natural flow and positioning. Hands—because they are hard to replicate in action and at rest. Hips—because this is really about proportions. Hips represent the relationship between the torso and the extremities. In fact, not using the proper proportions of any animal, character, or even architectural elements is obvious and a red flag.

Don’t crop out vital characterizing attributes. Move your camera back. Nothing annoys like a character’s head cropped out or an important element/artifice that is integral to their character. As C.B. Cebulski says (paraphrased), “If you draw Wolverine, don’t crop out his claws.”

I understand that styles differ and that one might be more into realism and another into some sort of Dada wet dream or fevered cartoon, but even if you’re drawing a three fingered, balloon headed clown, depth perspective and the relationship of that character to objects in the room must be established.  Filippo Brunelleschi is your friend.

And for goodness sake, avoid tangents. They kill depth. A tangent being two objects, at different distances, being connected by a shared line. They can be fixed somewhat fixed by a good inker and colorist, but if you are submitting your work as a penciller, then we don't have that to hold against you.

Okay, inkers, you are up. This is easy. Be aware of the light source. Where is it? How bright is it? What sort of angles will be created by the shadow and light. Thickness of line depends on placement of light source and relative position in the panel (i.e. background, foreground, distance and size). Inking is not tracing. It is a skill that develops depth and form as well as separation of objects in a two-dimensional space. FYI, shadows orient the action and how the eye determines the flow of it. In reality, both object and shadow are interpreted and processed by the visual cortex to allow for humans to predict where an object is going. It’s a triangulation process and thus inking is a three point process for me. Light source, object, shadow/highlights, together create motion in a still image and direct perception.

As for colorist’s work, it’s about mood and tone. Does the choice of color palate reflect the story? Hope so. Can’t go all pastel and fuzzy neons in a story that’s foundations are built on disturbing/dark subject matter… unless it’s a tool to convey absurdity or other contrasting elements in a parody or satire. Always confer with the writer to find the proper color pallet.

This goes for everyone: BE CONSISTENT. From beginning to end. If you happen to become better by the time you finish a first round of work, then go back and tidy up the beginning. One exception, if this is a deliberate artifice to show the transitions and changes of a character perspective or a fictive world like a world going through a magical transformation, but this is rare.

Pencillers, last but not least by any stretch, you make the words live and there is much to say but instead here’s a link to Blambot, the website of Nate Piekos. http://www.blambot.com/grammar.shtml

Yup, that's a bit of a tirade but it's not a comprehensive list of factors that we use to determine publishing and reading preferences. Hope it helps.

We wish you well in all your creative acts and motions. Persist and flourish. Good luck.

Cheers!

PS: if you're in the mood for some humor, then please have a look at the new Damn Heroes webcomic. http://damnheroes.com

PPS: we are willing to give tutorials on comic book publishing and on how to exhibit at conventions for a fee. Just drop us a line to inquire by using the form on the Contact page. http://waywardraven.com/contact/

Rejection letters decoded: a query's tale.

Rejection letters decoded: a query's tale. Writing is tough and trying to decode the underlying meaning of rejection letters you might get from editors/agents is tough too, so here's a tale of learning through defeat and some common phrases deciphered.

Let us start with the formation of an affinity. The slings and arrows of rejection penetrated the paper skin that once wrapped around my writer’s soul. It started with poetry rejection letters that came quickly and without remorse. The foul projectiles punctured my frail soul, propelled me against the creative wall, and after stumbling to my feet I ran back into the breach. Then, with novels and short stories, the arrows of rejection became sharper and dripped with a poison I unknowingly dipped them in. FYI, I’ve written more than a few novels that will never see the light of day. Years of work. Years of work. Years of hope impaled with diligent pikes called “Not for me” replies.

And this continued while some of my work was published. The difference between me a decade ago and now is that the delusions of grandeur were popped by the volleys of rejection. Not event the shield of my ego that was emblazoned with the words “They just don’t understand my greatness” could deflect the reality of rejection. So, I realized a few things. First, I was not as good as I thought (the hardest to come to terms with). Second, trying to retreat into the style and forms of the writers of the past I found to be masterful doesn’t always equate with the editor/agent’s notion of contemporary writing. Third, PUBLISHING IS A BUSINESS. Writing is an art. Sometimes the paths cross but it is not necessity. Lastly, chance. There are many reasons for rejection that aren’t directly related to competence of the composition: an agent might have a client who wrote something similar or has too many projects on hand to give a manuscript consideration it deserves, or someone just spilled coffee on them in the elevator and a dreadful mood makes them want to clear away anything that is a risk. And I would be remiss, if I didn’t mention bias. That is a force that blinds and is ever-present in all human activities, which is why we must be aware of them so to overcome them.

And yes, there are many stories of writers who went on to become major names after being rejected a multitude of times. So, there is hope. Also, PUBLISHING IS A BUSINESS made up of humans who make mistakes and who are averse to risk. That is what writers are in the beginning of their careers, a risk.

Okay, I’ll tell you a quick story of a rejection. This one hurt and changed the course of my development, which in turn has me now on the other side of the battle.

The first novel I tried to publish was about a young man who suffered from an undiagnosed mental illness. He went off to college unprepared for life by a dysfunctional family, even if they were well-to-do. His illness, which he had no idea was burgeoning, was the filter of his erratic perception and he gets caught up in alcohol and drug abuse at a small southern college. He meets a girl and pursues her but she does not feel the same for him. There is an experience with hallucinogenic drugs that alters his perception of reality and afflicts him with flashback hallucinations (all a part of the symbolic themes of course). He loses control of mind, body and choice. Then, a murder/suicide on the campus sends the protagonist into further turmoil but he manages to reclaim a semblance of control and makes a fateful decision.

So you know, the story takes place in 1993, it’s a Generation X tale, and the time I sent it out on submission was around 1999. All but four agents I queried took a look at a partial. All came back with a similar comment of “This representation of college life is unrealistic and the main character is hard to relate with because of his unstable moods.”

Well, that was the point of the character's creation. I wanted to let readers into the mind of a young man who was suffering from Bipolar hypomania so they could get a better understanding. Also, I thought that literary fiction was about difficult and layered characters. Why write a protagonist who was easy to identify with? It was counter to my vision. And likability never came into the picture.  To the second point, I honestly depicted events of excess and absurdity I witnessed in college so to show the inherent instability and danger of college campuses for those with mental illness. As I said, this was early 1999. Pre-VA Tech. And right before Columbine.

I understood the agents were people who most likely came through an educational and family system that was more advantageous than adversarial, and that mental illness was something from which they probably did not suffer so comprehending the protagonist would be a challenge for them. Naively, I thought such challenges were welcomed and surmised they just didn’t  get the importance of my work, but I sojourned on. I happened to become friends with a man who worked at what is now called the Hachette Book Group. He told me to pitch editors directly. This was something I thought was against the "NO Solicitations" protocol but he said it’s fine with many editors. Letters weren't manuscripts to which the prohibition was referring. He then told me I should look in Farrar, Straus and Giroux. (BTW, my friend left publishing a couple years ago but that's a story I'm not allowed to divulge.)

I pitched an editor at that esteemed publishing house and to my surprise a wonderful young editor asked to read the manuscript. A few weeks later, she said she was passing it along to her boss. Then I waited. Waited. Waited….

On one unseasonably cold  afternoon, a thick envelop came with the publishing house’s name on it. Anxiety shredded all notions of calm. Fear paralysis gripped my hands. The wisps of gray clouds stretched across the thin atmosphere above and I opened it. The first three sentences were complimentary. Quite in fact.

Then I read the rest. Breath sunk. My heart paused. I looked at the ground and could not lift my gaze for days. The letter reflected what the agents said. The representation of college life was alien to them, and even though he liked the voice, he didn’t think it suited their line at the time. I surmised they had been so far out of college that they were out of touch. This was in a manner true. After a couple weeks, I tried querying again. And again. And again, I was rationalizing away the slings and arrows that assailed me.

This was the first time that happened to me but it wasn’t the last. But, because of this initial experience, I went forth to learn and expand my writing so it wasn’t a failure. It was just the part of the process I needed to see clearly. So, I can relate to rejection and it still happens and always will but not with everything. The only real failure some say is quitting though coming to understand one’s talent and skills is important so you don’t get caught in the Sunk Cost fallacy.  However, the only thing a writer can do is keep trying and hope that chance, timing and mastery opens another door.

Now onto the second part. The deciphering of rejection letters. This is by no mean all-encompassing but these are some common phrases a writer might get along with some minor remedies.

Most writers or comic book artists get pretty vague comments on their work in a rejection letter. I have been on that side of the mirror, so let’s see if clarity can be conjured from some basic phrases from “we’re going to pass” letters.

• “It is an ambitious story and we wish you the best of luck placing it but we don’t see a fit for our line at this time”. This means you confused me. There we’re glints of promise, but overall, its structure is not organized enough to compel the reader. Basically, they are saying you had a good idea but didn’t pull it off because it was unfocused.

Good news on this one, you can revise and streamline the story. Sometimes we must simplify before layering complexity of language and theme. Cut it down to the bare bones and begin building the body again. Also, using a simple three act structure can help. Plan the plot points and move the characters along through adversity/obstacles of both internal and external conflict, raise stakes, and let the characters learn from their mistakes but not enough to solve the story problem until the end. Then, at the end, get out as quickly as possible.

• “The pacing did not move me along as a reader”. This could mean a few things. One, the story problem and inciting incident didn’t occur early enough to hook the reader and allow for ebb and flow of the narrative to take effect (AKA boring). Two, and most likely, there is too much exposition, detail, and certain plot points weren’t reached within the given attention span set aside for commercial prose. Or, it could also mean, there is an imbalance of character development over plot.

The simplest solution is to use the old “Rollercoaster/Sine Wave” pacing form. It’s easy if you break up a dramatic unit into two parts: the active and the reflective. The active is when a protagonist has a goal, actively makes strides to accomplish it but is met by an obstacle, usually the antagonist, which creates conflict that sets the protagonist back. Remember conflict doesn’t mean confrontation. The reflective is after the protagonist fails to accomplish the goal and is set back. Now, the characters can ruminate over what occurred and make a choice that leads to the next goal. During this section, a writer can add more world building details and delve into the characters’ thoughts and self-concepts that filter their perceptions. Want things to go fast, then write more of the active process and then to slow it down, write the reflective. You can vary the pitch and frequency of the curve that the pace follows. Doesn’t need to be uniform, you can begin with the reflective, but if you don’t start a story In Medias Res nowadays, don’t expect editors to read very far.

• “The dialogue was stilted”. Well, this one is a pickle, a sour one at that but obvious.

It can include but is not limited to a few observations. First, it might mean that all the interlocutors sound the same. Every character must vary in the usage of favored words, length of reply, preoccupation (i.e. doctors see things everywhere through a medial perspective or a religious person sees god elements), and degree of complexity. Also, it might mean that the dialogue is expository when it not need be. The plot events should explain the situations and not the dialogue for the most part. Dialogue should, to paraphrase Vonnegut about sentences, move the plot along or reveal the character and ideally do both. Finally, and this is the one I loathed to discover, the dialogue might be too truthful to the character. Meaning, people rarely tell the whole truth and often obscure it when speaking in reality. Easy example is when you feel down and someone asks you “How are you?” and you reply “Fine” even though you aren’t. There are situations of full revelation that are relevant but it must be in accordance with the plot development. Also, large monologues to start off stories aren’t the best idea for those without a preexisting fan base where as writer you have the leverage to do what you want. That goes for everything. These are just suggestions and all contemporary rules can and are broken.

•  “The characters are two-dimensional”. It means your characters were robots, predictable or cliches. Basically, they lacked depth and are more filler than substance.

This tends to happen when your characters are just reactive instead of proactive without a fully developed sense of self-concept. To eliminate such, you can do character profiles before you even start writing, or once the first draft is done. Figure out: who they think they are, their preoccupation filter, their goals, what they are willing to sacrifice for the goal, a psychological profile (are they sociopaths or introvert…etc), what hurts them, what do they love, what scares them and much more. Most of the list won’t make its way into the story, but it will allow you to know the character better and allow for a fuller development, which can change the plot, so understand this could be a great undertaking. Basically, a character needs to have more going on in their head than just their primary story goal and situational want/desire. Sure, the protagonist might be facing down an existential or worldly crisis, but he can still be worried about his cats. Most importantly, stories are about characters, the rest follows, even plot. I also recommend looking up hamartia, anagnorisis and peripeteia.

Remember, you will find exceptions to so-called writing rules of contemporary publishing by major writers. But, if this is the onset of your journey sometimes concession must be made to get to the point where you can test the waters of experimentation and innovation unless you come with literary credentials so to speak. Just for fun, I recommend reading Steven Pinker’s The Sense of Style (though primarily for non-fiction) and then Blake Synder’s Save the Cat (though for screenplays but holds true for major plot points and dialogue) just to see the contrasting of points-of-view regarding structure and style.

• Oh, almost forgot.  The old "I just didn't love it enough to pursue..."

This basically all of the above. Meaning, the manuscript needs another revision/draft. But that is hopeful. Remember, writing is rewriting and you can always improve. Well, not everyone but I'm sure you can.

If you happen to want to read the novel mentioned above, though a completed revised version than was sent out years ago, you can get a free ebook of The Excess Road on this site. Just click this link: http://waywardraven.com/free-stuff/

Best of luck,

Joshua Lee Andrew Jones

Here are some links to writers I respect about writing:

Kurt Vonnegut: http://www.writingclasses.com/InformationPages/index.php/PageID/538

Ernest Hemingway: http://www.openculture.com/2013/02/seven_tips_from_ernest_hemingway_on_how_to_write_fiction.html

Neil Gaiman: http://mentalfloss.com/article/50759/11-neil-gaiman-quotes-writing

All done, Winter Con 2014. Hello 2015

Hello, we are all done with the convention scene this year, Winter Con 2014 in Queens was the last, and we're excited to get planning for 2015. We have not made up the whole list yet but we plan on going to at least two new cons in 2015. We will, of course, be at NYCC and Boston Comic Con. It was an up and down year but we got new books out: Signed #2, Horsemen #2, Percy, and the Damn Heroes strip book. All of which you can see here-> http://waywardraven.storenvy.com/

Up for next year, we will introduce the new series The Committee by James Emmett. Very excited for this. Also, we will have new issue of The Ascendant, Horsemen, and Signed, along with a one-shot called Balloon World but hopefully much more. As for our adventures in children's books, one titled Morty is being illustrated by Alex, but we hope to include two more books and we are open to illustrator/author submissions as well.

Also, if there are any conventions you'd like us to attend on the east coast, please feel free to mention them to us via Twitter @waywardraven or comment below.

This isn't our last post of the year by any means but we do want to wish everyone a Happy Holiday Season!

Now for what you want, photos of Winter Con 2014 and cosplay.

Okay, that last one is from NYCC but it deserves to be posted again.

Ode to the Hulk, a poem in green.

Was inspired by Alex's drawing the other day at WinterCon so I wrote Ode to the Hulk, a poem in green. Sure it's a bit whimsy and not actually a poem to rival Dylan Thomas, but fun is fun, and if you really look, there's another layer beneath.  

Ode to the Hulk, a poem in green.

Oh Hulk,

oh how you SMASH

with such ease

and sophistication.

Oh Hulk,

oh why so MAD

dost nothing please

thy constitution.

Oh Hulk,

oh what you wear

with no seams

a purple revelation.

Oh Hulk,

oh when you clap

does it deem

a pure approbation.

Is it all

a play

performance art,

a word on socially de-constructed

institutions?

OR

Oh Hulk,

does Hulk

SMASH

because

Hulk can?

Forever green

Forever SMASH

Forever forsaking

we puny humans.

By Joshua Lee Andrew Jones

Ars longa, viate brevis.

Also, if you like Alex's sketch, you can purchase his artwork from the Wayward Raven Shop or read Damn Heroes.

You can find him as ASAPwasTaken on DeviantArt. If you like his work, throw him a few sheckles on Patreon.

He's also open to commissions so if you have a an idea that you'd like to come to life, then you can contact him through our Contact page.

Have a most wonderful day, night, today and tomorrow.

WinterCon 2014: comic books and gambling fun

Greetings and salutations, The outrageous fortune of 2014 comes to a close, the convention season is in the wind down, but we will be at WinterCon 2014 in Queens, NY on December 6th with fun comic books and more to sling as some of you can go a' gambling. That's right. It's at the Resorts World Casino http://nywintercon.com

Beyond just comic books, but that's enough for us, there will be cosplay by the likes of Yaya Han and Jennifer Rose. Nut if you're just in it for the comics, there are some fantastic guests besides us: Neal Adams http://www.nealadams.com/ , Frank Tieri https://twitter.com/franktieri , Billy Tucci, Herb trimpe, Bob Camp and Jim Salicrup to name but a few.

If you need any tips on attending comic book conventions, we got wrote a list on how to survive

So come for the comic books and head to the slots and blackjack tables when you feet get weary. You never know what luck may fall upon you but we'd feel quite lucky if you happened to stop our table.

Here's some items we'll have with us:

Hope you come down and see us. Check the convention's website for information on free shuttles from Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens. Be safe and have fun.

Ars longa, vitae brevis.